STATEMENT OF DR. G. REID LYON CHIEF
CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND BEHAVIOR BRANCH
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
9000 ROCKVILLE PIKE
BETHESDA, MD 20892
Committee on Labor and Human Resources
Room 430
Senate Dirkson Building
Washington, DC
April 28, 1998
OVERVIEW OF READING AND LITERACY INITIATIVES
I am Dr. Reid Lyon, the Chief of the Child Development and Behavior
Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
at the National Institutes of Health. I am pleased to have the opportunity
to present to you information about the results of the extensive research
that our Institute has supported on the process of learning to read in
our Nation's schools.
Chairman Jeffords and members of the committee, some children learn
to read and write with ease. Even before they enter school, they have developed
an understanding that the letters on a page can be sounded out to make
words and some preschool children can even read words correctly that they
have never seen before and comprehend what they have read. As Marilyn Adams
has reported, before school, and without any great effort or pressure on
the part of their parents, they pick up books, pencils, and paper, and
they are on their way, almost as though by magic.
However, the magic of this effortless journey into the world of reading
is available to only about 5% of our nation's children. It is suggested
in the research literature that another 20% to 30% learn to read relatively
easily once exposed to formal instruction, and it seems that youngsters
in this group learn to read in any classroom, with any instructional emphasis.
Unfortunately, it appears that for about 60% of our nation's children,
learning to read is a much more formidable challenge, and for at least
20% to 30% of these youngsters, reading is one of the most difficult tasks
that they will have to master throughout their schooling. Why is this so
unfortunate? Simply because if you do not learn to read and you live in
America, you do not make it in life. Consider that reading skill serves
as the major avenue to learning about other people, about history and social
studies, the language arts, science, mathematics, and the other content
subjects that must be mastered in school. When children do not learn to
read, their general knowledge, their spelling and writing abilities, and
their vocabulary development suffers in kind. Within this context, reading
skill serves as the major foundational skill for all school-based learning,
and without it, the chances for academic and occupational success are limited
indeed. Because of its importance and visibility, particularly during the
primary grades, difficulty learning to read squashes the excitement and
love for learning that many youngsters enter school with. It is embarrassing
and even devastating to read slowly and laboriously and to demonstrate
this weakness in front of peers on a daily basis. It is clear from our
NICHD-supported longitudinal studies that follow good and poor readers
from kindergarten into young adulthood that our young poor readers are
not used to such failure. By the end of the first grade, we begin to notice
substantial decreases in the children's self-esteem, self-concept, and
motivation to learn to read if they have not been able to master reading
skills and keep up with their age-mates. As we follow the children through
elementary and middle-school grades these problems compound, and, in many
cases very bright youngsters are unable to learn about the wonders of science,
mathematics, literature and the like because they can not read the grade-level
textbooks. By high school, these children's potential for entering college
has decreased to almost nil, with few choices available to them with respect
to occupational and vocational opportunities. These individuals constantly
tell us that they hate to read, primarily because it is such hard work,
and their reading is so slow and laborious. As one adolescent in one of
our longitudinal studies remarked recently, "I would rather have a root
canal than read ".
While failure to learn to read adequately is much more likely among
poor children, among nonwhite children, and among nonnative speakers of
English, recent data derived from the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (l994) reveals an alarming trend. In the State of California,
59% of fourth grade children had little or no mastery of the knowledge
and skills necessary to perform reading activities at the fourth grade
level, compared to a national average of 44% below basic reading levels.
Even more alarming, is that this evidence of serious reading failure cuts
across all ethnic and socioeconomic variables. While 71% of African-Americans,
81% of Hispanics and 23% of Asians were reading below basic levels, 44%
of white students in the fourth grade were also below the basic reading
level necessary to use reading as a skill. Moreover, 49% of the fourth
grade children in California who were reading below basic levels were from
homes where the parents had graduated from college. In fact, the children
of college-educated parents in California scored lowest with respect to
their national cohort. These data underscore the fact that reading failure
is a serious National problem and can not simply be attributed to poverty,
immigration, or the learning of English as a second language. The psychological,
social, and economic consequences of reading failure are legion.
It is for this reason that the National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHD) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
considers reading failure to reflect not only an educational problem, but
a significant public health problem as well. Within this context, a large
research network consisting of 41 research sites in North America, Europe,
and Asia are working hard to identify (1) the critical environmental, experiential,
cognitive, genetic, neurobiological, and instructional conditions that
foster strong reading development; (2) the risk factors that predispose
youngsters to reading failure; and (3) the instructional procedures that
can be applied to ameliorate reading deficits at the earliest possible
time. The NICHD has supported research to understand normal reading development
and reading difficulties continuously since 1965. During the past 33 years,
NICHD supported scientists have studied the reading development of 34,501
children and adults. Many studies have been devoted to understanding the
normal reading process, and 21,860 good readers have participated in investigations,
some for as long as 12 years. Significant effort has also been deployed
to understand why many children do not learn to read. To address this critical
question, 12,641 individuals with reading difficulties have been studied,
many for as long as 12 years. In addition, since 1985, the NICHD has initiated
studies designed to develop early identification methods that can pinpoint
children during kindergarten and the first grade who are at-risk for reading
failure. These studies have provided the foundation for several prevention
and early intervention projects now underway at 11 sites in the U.S. and
Canada. Since 1985, 7,669 children (including 1,423 good readers) have
participated in these reading instruction studies, and 3,600 youngsters
are currently enrolled in longitudinal early intervention studies in Texas,
Washington, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Florida, Colorado, North
Carolina, and Washington, D.C. These studies have involved the participation
of 1,012 classroom teachers, working in 266 schools and 985 classrooms.
( A summary of the NICHD Reading Research Program is included with this
testimony).
With this as background, my remaining testimony will focus on addressing
several major questions that may be of interest to the Committee on Labor
and Human Resources on the topic of Reading and Literacy Initiatives. These
questions are:
1) How Do Children Learn To Read?
2) Why Do Some Children (and Adults) Have Difficulties Learning to Read?
3) How Can We Help Children Learn to Read? For Which Children are Which
Teaching Approaches Most Beneficial at Which States of Reading Development?
HOW DO CHILDREN LEARN TO READ
UNDERSTANDING HOW SOUNDS ARE CONNECTED TO PRINT
In general, learning to read the English language is not as easy as
conventional wisdom would suggest. Every type of writing system whether
it be a syllabic system as used by the Japanese, a morphosyllabic system
as used by the Chinese (where a written symbol represents a unit of meaning),
or an alphabetic system that is used in English, Spanish, and Scandinavian
languages (to name a few) present challenges to the beginning reader. For
example, in an English alphabetic system, the individual letters on the
page are abstract and meaningless, in and of themselves. They must eventually
be linked to equally abstract sounds, called phonemes, blended together,
and pronounced as words, where meaning is finally realized. To learn to
read English, the child must figure out the relationship between sounds
and letters. Thus, the beginning reader must learn the connections between
the 40 or so sounds of spoken English (the phonemes), and the 26 letters
of the alphabet. What our NICHD research has taught us is that in order
for a beginning reader to learn how to connect or translate printed symbols
(letters and letter patterns) into sound, the would-be reader must understand
that our speech can be segmented or broken into small sounds (phoneme awareness)
and that the segmented units of speech can be represented by printed forms
(Phonics). This understanding that written spellings systematically represent
the phonemes of spoken words (termed the alphabetic principle) is absolutely
necessary for the development of accurate and rapid word reading skills.
.
Why is phoneme awareness so critical for the beginning reader? Because
if children cannot perceive the sounds in spoken words - for example, if
they cannot "hear" the "at" sound in "fat" and "cat" and perceive that
the difference lies in the first sound - they will have difficulty decoding
or "sounding out" words in a rapid and accurate fashion. This awareness
of the sound structure of our language seems so easy and commonplace that
we take it for granted. But many children do not develop phoneme awareness,
and for some interesting reasons that we are now beginning to understand.
Unlike writing, the speech we use to communicate orally does not consist
of separate sounds in words. For example, while a written word like "cat"
has three letter-sound units, the ear hears only one sound, not three,
when the word "cat" is spoken aloud. This merging and overlapping of sounds
into a sound "bundle" makes oral communication much more efficient. Consider
how long it would take to have a conversation if each of the words that
we uttered were segmented or "chopped" into their sound structure. In essence
we would be spelling aloud the words that we were speaking. From the NICHD
studies that were initiated in l965 to understand how the reading process
develops, we now have strong evidence that it is not the ear that understands
that a spoken word like "cat" is divided into three sounds and that these
discrete sounds can be linked to the letters C-A-T, it is the brain that
performs this function. In some youngsters, the brain seems to have an
easy time processing this type of information. However, in many children,
the skill is only learned with difficulty, and thus must be taught directly,
explicitly, and by a well trained and informed teacher. It has also become
clear to us that the development of these critical early reading-related
skills such as phoneme awareness and phonics are fostered when children
are read to at home during the preschool years, when they learn their letter
and number names, and when they are introduced at very early ages to concepts
of print and literacy activities.
Does this mean that children who have a difficulty understanding that
spoken words are composed of discrete individual sounds that can be linked
to letters suffer from brain dysfunction or damage? Not at all. It simply
means that the neural systems that perceive the phonemes in our language
are less efficient than in other children. This difference in neural efficiency
can also be hypothesized to underlie the individual differences that we
see every day in learning any skill such as singing, playing an instrument,
constructing a house, painting a portrait, and the like. In some cases,
our NICHD studies have taught us that the phonological differences we see
in good and poor readers have a genetic basis. In other children, the differences
seem to be attributable to a lack of exposure to language patterns and
literacy-based interactions and materials during the preschool years.
As pointed out, the development of phoneme awareness, the development
of an understanding of the alphabetic principle, and the translation of
these skills to the application of phonics in reading words are non-negotiable
beginning reading skills that ALL children must master in order to understand
what they read and to learn from their reading sessions. Printed letters
and words are the basic data on which reading depends, and the emerging
reader must be able to recognize accurately and quickly spelling patterns
and their mappings to speech. To recapitulate, these skills are supported
nicely when children receive an abundance of early literacy experiences
in the home and in preschool. But the development of phoneme awareness
and phonics, while NECESSARY, are NOT SUFFICIENT, for learning to read
the English language so that meaning can be derived from print. In addition
to learning how to "sound out" new and/or unfamiliar words, the beginning
reader must eventually become proficient in reading, at a very fast pace,
larger units of print such as syllable patterns, meaningful roots, suffixes,
and whole words.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY
While the ability to read words accurately is a NECESSARY skill in learn
to read, the speed at which this is done becomes a critical factor in ensuring
that children understand what they read. As one child recently remarked,
"if you don't ride a bike fast enough, you fall off". Likewise, if the
reader does not recognize words quickly enough, the meaning will be lost.
Although the initial stages of reading for many students require the learning
of phoneme awareness and phonics principles, substantial practice of those
skills, and continual application of those skills in text, fluency and
automaticity in decoding and word recognition must be acquired as well.
Consider that a young reader (and even older readers for that matter) has
only so much attentional capacity and cognitive energy to devote to a particular
task. If the reading of the words on the page is slow and labored, the
reader simply cannot remember what they have read, much less relate the
ideas they have read about to their own background knowledge. Children
vary in the amount of practice that is required for fluency and automaticity
in reading to occur. Some youngsters can read a word only once to recognize
it again with greater speed; others need more than 20 or more exposures.
The average child needs between four and 14 exposures to automatize the
recognition of a new word. Therefore, in learning to read, it is vital
that children read a large amount of text at their independent reading
level (95% accuracy), and that the text format provides specific practice
in the skills being learned.
CONSTRUCTING MEANING FROM PRINT
The ultimate goal of reading instruction is to enable children to understand
what they read. Again, the development of phoneme awareness, phonics skills,
and the ability to read words fluently and automatically are NECESSARY
but NOT SUFFICIENT for the construction of meaning from text. The ability
to understand what is read appears to be based on several factors. Children
who comprehend well, seem to be able to activate their relevant background
knowledge when reading - that is, they can relate what is on the page to
what they already know. Good comprehenders also have good vocabularies,
since it is extremely difficult to understand something you can not define.
Good comprehenders also have a knack for summarizing, predicting, and clarifying
what they have read, and frequently use questions to guide their understanding.
Good comprehenders are also facile in employing the sentence structure
within the text to enhance their comprehension.
In general, if children can read the words on a page accurately and
fluently, they will be able to construct meaning at two levels. At the
first level, literal understanding is achieved. However, constructing meaning
requires far more than literal comprehension. Child must eventually guide
themselves through text by asking questions like. "Why am I reading this
and how does this information relate to my reasons for doing so?', "What
is the author's point of view?", " Do I understand what the author is saying
and why?", "Is the text internally consistent?", and so on. It is this
second level of comprehension that leads readers to reflective, purposeful
understanding.
The development of reading comprehension skills, like the development
of phoneme awareness, phonics, and fluency, needs to be fostered by highly
trained teachers. Recent research shows that the teacher must arrange for
opportunities for students to discuss the highlights of what they have
read and any difficulties they have had when reading. Because the grammatical
structures of written text are more varied and complex than those of casual,
oral language (speaking to one another), regular exploration and explicit
instruction on formal syntax is warranted. Children's reflections on what
they have read can also be directly fostered through instruction in comprehension
strategies. These sorts of discussions and activities should be conducted
throughout a range of literacy genres, both fiction and nonfiction, and
should be a regular component of the language arts curriculum throughout
the children's school years.
OTHER FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE LEARNING TO READ
Our research continues to converge on the following findings. Good readers
are phonemically aware and understand the alphabetic principle and can
apply these skills to the development and application of phonics skills
when reading words, and can accomplish these applications in a fluent and
accurate manner. Given the ability to rapidly and automatically decode
and recognize words, good readers bring strong vocabularies and good syntactic
and grammatical skills to the reading comprehension process, and actively
relate what is being read to their own background knowledge via a variety
of strategies. But what factors can provide a firm foundation for these
skills to develop?
It is clear from research on emerging literacy that learning to read
is a relatively lengthy process that begins very early in development and
clearly before children enter formal schooling. Children who receive stimulating
literacy experiences from birth onward appear to have an edge when it comes
to vocabulary development, an understanding of the goals of reading, and
an awareness of print and literacy concepts. Children who are read to frequently
at very young ages become exposed in interesting and exciting ways to the
sounds of our language, to the concept of rhyming, and to other word and
language play that serves to provide the foundation for the development
of phoneme awareness. As children are exposed to literacy activities at
young ages, they begin to recognize and discriminate letters. Without a
doubt, children who have learned to recognize and print most letters as
preschoolers will have less to learn upon school entry. The learning of
letter names is also important because the names of many letters contained
the sounds they most often represent, thus orienting youngsters early to
the alphabetic principle or how letters and sounds connect. Ultimately,
children's ability to understand what they are reading is inextricably
linked to their background knowledge. Very young children who are provided
opportunities to learn, think, and talk about new areas of knowledge will
gain much from the reading process. With understanding comes the clear
desire to read more and to read frequently, ensuring that reading practice
takes place.
WHY DO SOME CHILDREN (AND ADULTS) HAVE DIFFICULTIES
LEARNING TO READ?
Difficulties learning to read result from a combination of factors.
In general, children who are most at-risk for reading failure are those
who enter school with limited exposure to language and who have little
prior understanding of concepts related to phonemic sensitivity, letter
knowledge, print awareness, the purposes of reading, and general verbal
skills, including vocabulary. Children raised in poverty, youngsters with
limited proficiency in English, children with speech and hearing impairments,
and children from homes where the parent's reading levels are low are relatively
predisposed to reading failure. Likewise, youngsters with subaverage intellectual
capabilities have difficulties learning to read, particularly in the reading
comprehension domain.
Given this general background, recent research has been able to identify
and replicate findings which point to at least four factors that hinder
reading development among children irrespective of their socioeconomic
level and ethnicity. These four factors include deficits in phoneme awareness
and the development of the alphabetic principle (and the accurate and fluent
application of these skills to textual reading), deficits in acquiring
reading comprehension strategies and applying them to the reading of text,
the development and maintenance of motivation to learn to read, and the
inadequate preparation of teachers.
DEFICITS IN PHONEME AWARENESS AND THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE ALPHABETIC PRINCIPLE
In essence, children who have difficulties learning to read can be readily
observed. The signs of such difficulty are: a labored approach to decoding
or "sounding" unknown or unfamiliar words and repeated misidentification
of known words. Reading is hesitant and characterized by frequent starts
and stops and multiple mispronunciations. If asked about the meaning of
what has been read, the child frequently has little to say. Not because
he or she is not smart enough; in fact, many youngsters who have difficulty
learning to read are bright and motivated to learn to read - at least initially.
Their poor comprehension occurs because they take far too long to read
the words, leaving little energy for remembering and understanding what
they have read.
Unfortunately, there is no way to bypass this decoding and word recognition
stage of reading. A deficiency in these skills cannot be appreciably offset
by using context to figure out the pronunciation of unknown words. In essence,
while one learns to read for the fundamental purpose of deriving meaning
from print, the key to comprehension starts with the immediate and accurate
reading of words. In fact, difficulties in decoding and word recognition
are at the core of most reading difficulties. To be sure, there are some
children who can read words accurately and quickly yet do have difficulties
comprehending, but they constitute a small portion of those with reading
problems.
If the ability to gain meaning from print is dependent upon fast, accurate,
and automatic decoding and word recognition, what factors hinder the acquisition
of these basic reading skills? As mentioned above, young children who have
a limited exposure to both oral language and print before they enter school
are at-risk for reading failure. However, many children with robust oral
language experience, average to above intelligence and frequent interactions
with books since infancy show surprising difficulties learning to read.
Why?
In contrast to good readers who understand that segmented units of speech
can be linked to letters and letter patterns, poor readers have substantial
difficulty developing this "alphabetic principle". The culprit appears
to be a deficit in phoneme awareness - the understanding that words are
made up of sound segments called phonemes. Difficulties in developing phoneme
awareness can have genetic and neurobiological origins or can be attributable
to a lack of exposure to language patterns and usage during the preschool
years. The end result is the same however. Children who lack phoneme awareness
have difficulties linking speech sounds to letters - their decoding skills
are labored and weak, resulting in extremely slow reading. This labored
access to print renders comprehension impossible. Thus the purpose for
reading is nullified because the children are too dysfluent to make sense
out of what they read.
In studying approximately 34,501 thousand children over the past 33
years, we have learned the following with respect to the role that phonemic
awareness plays in the development of phonics skills and fluent and automatic
word reading:
1. Phonemic awareness skills assessed in kindergarten and first grade
serve as potent predictors of difficulties learning to read. We have learned
how to measure phonemic awareness skills as early as the first semester
in kindergarten with tasks that take only 15 minutes to administer - and
over the past decade we have refined these tasks so that we can predict
with approximately 80% to 90% accuracy who become good readers and who
will have difficulties learning to read.
2. We have learned that the development of phonemic awareness is a necessary
but not sufficient condition for learning to read. A child must integrate
phonemic skills into the learning of phonics principles, must practice
reading so that word recognition becomes rapid and accurate, and must learn
how to actively use comprehension strategies to enhance meaning.
3. We have begun to understand how genetics are involved in learning
to read, and this knowledge may ultimately contribute to our prevention
efforts through the assessment of family reading histories.
4. We are entering very exciting frontiers in understanding how early
brain development can provide a window on how reading develops. Likewise,
we are conducting studies to help us understand how specific teaching methods
change reading behavior and how the brain changes as reading develops.
5. We have learned that just as many girls as boys have difficulties
learning to read. Until five years ago, the conventional wisdom was that
many more boys than girls had such difficulties. Now females should have
equal access to screening and intervention programs.
6. We have learned that for 90% to 95% of poor readers, prevention and
early intervention programs that combine instruction in phoneme awareness,
phonics, fluency development, and reading comprehension strategies, provided
by well trained teachers, can increase reading skills to average reading
levels. However, we have also learned that if we delay intervention until
nine-years-of-age, (the time that most children with reading difficulties
receive services), approximately 75% of the children will continue to have
difficulties learning to read throughout high school. To be clear, while
older children and adults can be taught to read, the time and expense of
doing so is enormous.
DEFICITS IN ACQUIRING READING COMPREHENSION
STRATEGIES
Some children encounter obstacles in learning to read because they do
not derive meaning from the material that they read. In the later grades,
higher order comprehension skills become paramount for learning. Reading
comprehension places significant demands on language comprehension and
general verbal abilities. Constraints in these areas will typically limit
comprehension. In a more specific vein, deficits in reading comprehension
are related to: (1) inadequate understanding of the words used in the text;
(2) inadequate background knowledge about the domains represented in the
text; (3) a lack of familiarity with the semantic and syntactic structures
that can help to predict the relationships between words; (4) a lack of
knowledge about different writing conventions that are used to achieve
different purposes via text (humor, explanation, dialogue, etc.); (5) verbal
reasoning ability which enables the reader to "read between the lines",
and (6) the ability to remember verbal information.
If children are not provided early and consistent experiences that are
explicitly designed to foster vocabulary development, background knowledge,
the ability to detect and comprehend relationships among verbal concepts,
and the ability to actively employ strategies to ensure understanding and
retention of material, reading failure will occur no matter how robust
word recognition skills are.
Our current understanding of how to develop many of these critical language
and reasoning capabilities related to reading comprehension is not as well
developed as the information related to phoneme awareness, phonics, and
reading fluency. We have not yet obtained clear answers with respect to
why some children have a difficult time learning vocabulary and how to
improve vocabulary skils. Our knowledge about the causes and consequences
of deficits in syntactical development is sparse. A good deal of excellent
research has been conducted on the application of reading comprehension
strategies, but our knowledge of how to teach children to apply these strategies
in an independent manner and across contexts is just emerging.
THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF MOTIVATION
TO LEARN TO READ
A major factor that aids or limits the amount of improvement that a
child may make in reading is highly related to their motivation to persist
in learning to read despite difficulties. Very little is known with respect
to the exact timing and course of motivational problems in reading development,
but it is clear that reading failure has a devastating effect on children.
In the primary grades, reading activities constitute the major portion
of academic activities undertaken in classrooms, and children who struggle
with reading are quickly noticed by peers and teachers. Although most children
enter formal schooling with positive attitudes and expectations for success,
those who encounter difficulties learning to read clearly attempt to avoid
engaging in reading behavior as early as the middle of the first grade
year. It is known that successful reading development is predicated on
practice in reading, and obviously the less a child practices, the less
developed the various reading skills will become.
To counter these highly predictable declines in the motivation to learn
to read, prevention and early intervention programs are critical.
INADEQUATE PREPARATION OF TEACHERS
As evidence mounts that reading difficulties originate in large part
from difficulties in developing phoneme awareness, phonics, reading fluency,
and reading comprehension strategies, the need for informed instruction
for the millions of children with insufficient reading skills is an increasingly
urgent problem. Unfortunately, several recent studies and surveys of teacher
knowledge about reading development and difficulties indicate that many
teachers are underprepared to teach reading. Most teachers receive little
formal instruction in reading development and disorders during either undergraduate
and/or graduate studies, with the average teacher completing only two reading
courses. Surveys of teachers taking these courses indicate: (A) teachers
rarely have the opportunity to observe professors demonstrate instructional
reading methods with children; (B) coursework is superficial and typically
unrelated to teaching practice; and (C) the supervision of student teaching
and practicum experiences is fragmentary and inconsistent. At present,
motivated teachers are often left to obtain specific skills in teaching
phonemic awareness, phonics, reading fluency, and comprehension on their
own by seeking out workshops or specialized instructional manuals.
Teachers who instruct youngsters who display reading difficulties must
be well versed in understanding the conditions that have to be present
for children to develop robust reading skills. They also must be thoroughly
trained to assess and identify children at-risk for reading failure at
early ages. Unfortunately, many teachers and administrators have been caught
between conflicting schools of though about how to teach reading and how
to help students who are not progressing easily. In reading education,
teachers are frequently presented with a "one Size Fits All" philosophy
that emphasizes either a "whole language" or "phonics" orientation to instruction.
No doubt, this parochial type of preparation places many children at continued
risk for reading failure since it is well established that no reading program
should be without all the major components of reading instruction (phoneme
awareness, phonics, fluency, reading comprehension) and the real question
is which children need what, how, for how long, with what type of teacher,
and in what type of setting.
It is hard to find disagreement in the educational community that the
direction and fabric of teacher education programs in language arts and
reading must change. However, bringing about such change will be difficult.
In addition, if teacher preparation in the area of language and reading
is expected to become more thoughtful and systematic, changes in how teaching
competencies and certification requirements are developed and implemented
is a must. Currently, in many states, the certification offices within
state departments of education do not maintain formal and collaborative
relationships with academic departments within colleges of education. Thus,
the requirements that a student may be expected to satisfy for a college
degree may bear little relationship to the requirements for a teaching
certificate. More alarming is the fact that both university and state department
of education requirements for the teaching of reading may not reflect,
in any way, the type and depth of knowledge that teachers must have to
ensure literacy for all.
FOR WHICH CHILDREN ARE WHICH TEACHING APPROACHES
MOST BENEFICIAL AT WHICH STAGES OF READING DEVELOPMENT?
1. Learning to read is a lengthy and difficult process for many children,
and success in learning to read is based in large part on developing language
and literacy-related skills very early in life. A massive effort needs
to be undertaken to inform parents, and the educational and medical communities
of the need to involve children in reading from the first days of life
- to engage children in playing with language through nursery rhymes, storybooks,
and writing activities. To bring to children as early as possible experiences
that help them understand the purposes of reading, and the wonder and joy
that can be derived from reading. Parents must become intimately aware
of the importance of vocabulary development and the use of verbal interactions
with their youngsters to enhance grammar, syntax, and verbal reasoning.
2. Young preschool children should be encouraged to learn the letters
of the alphabet, to discriminate letters from one another, to print letters,
and to attempt to spell words that they hear. By introducing young children
to print, their exposure to the purposes of reading and writing will increase
and their knowledge of the conventions of print and their awareness of
print concepts will increase.
3. Reading out loud to children is a proven activity for developing
vocabulary growth and language expansion and plays a causal role in developing
both receptive and expressive language capabilities. Reading out loud can
also be used to enhance children's background knowledge of new concepts
that may appear in both oral and written language.
4. Our NICHD prevention and early intervention studies in Houston, Tallahassee,
Albany, Syracuse, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. all speak
to the importance of early identification and intervention with children
at-risk for reading failure. Procedures now exist to identify such children
with good accuracy. This information needs to be widely disseminated to
schools, teachers, and parents.
5. Kindergarten programs should be designed so that all children will
develop the prerequisite phonological, vocabulary, and early reading skills
necessary for success in the first grade. All children should acquire the
ability to recognize and print both upper and lowercase letters with reasonable
ease and accuracy, develop familiarity with the basic purposes and mechanisms
of reading and writing, and develop age-appropriate language comprehension
skills.
6. Beginning reading programs should be constructed to ensure that adequate
instructional time is allotted to the teaching of phonemic awareness skills,
phonics skills, the development of reading fluency and automaticity, and
the development of reading comprehension strategies. All of these components
of reading are necessary but not sufficient in and of themselves. For children
demonstrating difficulty in learning to read, it is imperative that each
of these components be taught within an integrated context and that ample
practice in reading familiar material be afforded. For some children, our
research demonstrates that explicit, systematic instruction is crucial
in helping them to understand and apply critical phonemic, phonics, fluency,
and reading comprehension skills. Even for children who seem to grasp reading
concepts easily, learning to read is not a natural process - reading instruction
must be thoughtful, planned, and must incorporate the teaching of all the
critical reading skills.
7. A major impediment to serving the needs of children demonstrating
difficulties learning to read is current teacher preparation practices.
Many teachers lack basic knowledge about the structure of the English language,
reading development, and the nature of reading difficulties. Major efforts
should be undertaken to ensure that colleges of education possess the expertise
and commitment to foster expertise in teachers at both preservice and inservice
levels.
8. The preparation of teachers and the teaching of reading in our Nation's
classrooms must be based upon research evidence of the highest caliber
and relevance. Research that is used to guide policy and instructional
practice should be characterized by methodological rigor and the convergence
of studies demonstrated to be representative, reliable, valid and described
with sufficient clarity and specificity to permit independent replication.
Moreover, we must realize that no one study should be used to guide practice.
To reiterate a significant point, the research knowledge that is employed
to guide policy and practice must inform us how different components of
reading behavior are best developed by various approaches to reading instruction
for children of differing backgrounds, learning characteristics, and literacy
experiences. |